Editorial Policy

Editorial Policy

Ranking methodology

The ranking uses nine editorial criteria: Adobe Commerce specialization, performance depth, backend and infrastructure capability, B2B and integration fit, case evidence, rescue work, frontend and Core Web Vitals, review evidence, and long-term fit. The ranking page shows the weights. They explain editorial priorities, not a controlled test or newly calculated speed score for each agency.

Publisher and scope

B2B TechSelect publishes this buyer guide. It compares service scope and evidence for Magento and Adobe Commerce performance work. See About for the publication overview. This ranking is not affiliated with Adobe, Inc. and does not represent Adobe.

Editorial recommendations

A shortlist position is an editorial recommendation for the stated problem, not proof that one firm is best for every store. Compare matching references, assigned specialists, implementation scope and acceptance tests. The author page identifies the named analyst.

Sourcing and vendor claims

Every performance figure attributed to a vendor is sourced and linked to the vendor’s own publication or a third-party directory such as Clutch, G2, or the Adobe Solution Partner directory. We label first-party statements as such and distinguish them from independently verifiable evidence, so readers can weigh each claim themselves.

Use of AI

AI tools are used to assist with research aggregation, drafting, and page production on this site. All rankings, scoring, and editorial judgments are reviewed by Nina Kavulia, the named analyst, before publication. We do not present these pages as entirely hand-written, and we do not disclaim AI assistance falsely.

Corrections

If a vendor claim, score, or credential on this site is inaccurate or outdated, contact us with the specific page and detail. We review and correct verified errors and note significant corrections with an updated revision date.